This single URL answers the same intent cluster for arc magnet factory and arc magnet factories. You get a tool-first screening result in seconds, then a source-backed report layer that explains temperature boundaries, demagnetization risk, supply tradeoffs, and what to do next.
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Metric | Screening guide | Source basis |
|---|---|---|
| Operating temperature | <=350 C preferred, 351-538 C conditional, >538 C reject | Uses conservative engineering screening windows for early factory qualification; confirm with project-specific magnet-curve data. |
| Opposing demagnetizing field | <=700 Oe preferred, 701-1200 Oe conditional, >1200 Oe reject | Thresholds are screening heuristics for early factory qualification and are not universal standards; cross-supplier Br/Hcj/BHmax comparisons should use aligned measurement method and temperature basis (IEC 60404 context). |
| L/D ratio (magnet length / diameter) | >=1.8 preferred, 1.2-1.79 conditional, <1.2 high risk | Low L/D generally increases self-demagnetization sensitivity; treat as a screening control and validate with final simulation/testing. |
| Lead time for complex ring geometry | >=8 weeks preferred, 6-7 conditional, <6 high risk | Process-based procurement heuristic to avoid RFQ churn; not a public benchmark. |
1) Factory intent is RFQ-first, not catalog-first
The current live query pattern is still dominated by supplier/factory RFQ flows, so this route keeps tool execution and action routing above long-form reading.
Evidence: E1
2) Concentration risk should be anchored to dated thresholds
IEA concentration trend plus EU CRMA dependency direction gives a concrete boundary for dual-source and regional fallback design instead of narrative-only country risk.
Evidence: E5, E7
3) Policy shifts and price shifts must both drive RFQ controls
2025 export-control changes and NdPr price movement indicate that quote-expiry and split sample/production gates are not optional hygiene but practical risk controls.
Evidence: E3, E4
4) Compliance and certification checks need independent gates
EU Article 33/SCIP and IATF status/rule-edition checks should be executed as separate controls to avoid late-stage release or shipment failures.
Evidence: E11, E9
5) U.S. quote feasibility now needs a tariff-scope branch
From January 1, 2026, covered permanent magnets in U.S.-bound flows can carry a 25% additional duty. Price-only comparisons without customs-scope checks can produce false-positive quotes.
Evidence: E12, E13
6) Datasheet numbers must be normalized before supplier ranking
Br/Hcj/BHmax comparisons should be tied to aligned measurement method and temperature basis; otherwise, factory ranking can be distorted despite similar nominal grades.
Evidence: E16
Global EV sales (2024)
17M+
IEA reports global electric car sales exceeded 17 million in 2024 (+25% year-on-year).
Source: S9
China EV sales (2024)
11M+
IEA reports China sold over 11 million electric cars in 2024, nearly two-thirds of global EV sales.
Source: S9
U.S. REE import reliance (2025)
67%
USGS reports U.S. net import reliance for rare-earth compounds/metals was 67% in 2025.
Source: S2
U.S. REE imports change (2025)
+169%
USGS reports U.S. rare-earth compounds/metals import volume increased 169% in 2025.
Source: S2
U.S. additional duty on covered permanent magnets
+25%
Federal Register notice 2024-21217 applies a 25% additional duty to covered permanent magnets (e.g., HTS 8505.11.00) effective January 1, 2026.
Source: S12
Top-3 refining concentration (2024)
86%
IEA reports the top-three refining-nation share rose from ~82% (2020) to ~86% (2024).
Source: S3
CRMA single-country strategic benchmark (2030)
<=65%
CRMA Article 5 sets a 2030 strategic benchmark: no more than 65% of EU annual consumption at each relevant stage from one third country.
Source: S14
CRMA Article 29 baseline weight trigger
>0.2 kg
For many covered products, Article 29 permanent-magnet information duties apply when total permanent-magnet weight exceeds 0.2 kg, with timeline conditions.
Source: S14
EU rare-earth refining dependency
100%
European Commission states all rare earths used for permanent magnets in the EU are currently refined in China.
Source: S10
Robot installation concentration
54%
IFR reports China deployed 295,000 of 542,000 global industrial robot installations in 2024 (54%).
Source: S8
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Audience type | Fit statement | Boundary rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Most suitable for | Teams shortlisting arc-magnet factories with RFQ readiness checks | You need fast stage-1 qualification on thermal/demag boundary, compliance evidence, and sourcing continuity. |
| Also suitable for | Procurement + engineering programs with dual-source planning | You need one page that links immediate checker output with risk controls and evidence references. |
| Not suitable for | Final design release or PPAP-equivalent technical signoff | This page does not replace full electromagnetic simulation, validation tests, and contract/legal review. |
| Not suitable for | Pure catalog purchase with no drawing/tolerance ownership | Factory decisions for custom arc magnets require explicit assumptions and traceable data, not price-only comparison. |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Severity | Gap found | Stage1b fix | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | Two EV-sales key numbers were mapped to a minerals report source rather than an EV market source. | Re-mapped EV sales conclusions to IEA Global EV Outlook 2025 executive summary and kept minerals claims in mineral-specific sources. | Closed |
| High | Concentration narrative had one over-strong shorthand claim and lacked policy-grade dependency thresholds. | Replaced shorthand with auditable concentration metrics (IEA refining concentration trend + EU CRMA dependency benchmarks). | Closed |
| Medium | No explicit timeline connected 2024-2026 policy/market signals to RFQ governance actions. | Added a dated policy-signal timeline with required actions for quote expiry, dual-source trigger, and release governance. | Closed |
| Medium | Cost-risk handling under rare-earth price swings was underspecified for arc-magnet RFQs. | Added USGS NdPr oxide 2024->2025 price move and tied it to quote-validity windows and split-gate commercial controls. | Closed |
| High | US-bound landed-cost branch did not explicitly include Section 301 additional-duty scope for covered permanent magnets in 2026. | Added Section 301 tariff boundary and timeline node (HTS 8505.11.00 with Chapter 99 mapping) plus explicit pre-quote landed-cost control. | Closed |
| High | CRMA concentration narrative lacked product-level permanent-magnet disclosure trigger and deadline boundaries. | Added CRMA Article 29 applicability conditions (including >0.2 kg threshold and effective-date logic) into policy, risk, and action sections. | Closed |
| Medium | Magnetic-property comparisons lacked an explicit metrology boundary, which can make supplier datasheets non-comparable. | Added IEC 60404-5 and IEC 60404-8-1 method/spec references and linked them to quote-evidence normalization requirements. | Closed |
| Low | Automotive governance section did not explicitly state current IATF rule-edition cutoff date. | Added IATF Rules 6th Edition effective date and obsolescence date for Rules 5th Edition into evidence and boundary guidance. | Closed |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| ID | New fact | Date | Decision impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | A May 15, 2026 live SERP sample shows 9 of the top 10 results are supplier/factory transactional pages (RFQ/customization), not long-form educational pages. | Brave web query sample, May 15, 2026 | Confirms tool-first IA: screening + action CTA must appear before long-form narrative for this intent. | S1 |
| E2 | USGS reports U.S. rare-earth compounds/metals imports rose 169% in 2025, while net import reliance for compounds/metals was 67%. | USGS MCS 2026 (published February 2026) | Justifies explicit dual-source and quote-validity gates even when unit price looks acceptable. | S2 |
| E3 | USGS lists NdPr oxide average price rising from $55/kg (2024) to $69/kg (2025), a roughly 25% year-on-year increase. | USGS MCS 2026 price table | Adds a concrete reason to use quote-expiry windows and split sample-vs-production pricing gates. | S2 |
| E4 | USGS documents that China tightened heavy-rare-earth export controls in April 2025, expanded scope in October 2025, then suspended the October expansion for one year in November 2025 while April controls remained. | USGS MCS 2026 events section | Turns policy volatility into executable RFQ governance triggers instead of static country-risk commentary. | S2 |
| E5 | IEA reports top-three refining-nation share for key energy minerals increased from ~82% (2020) to ~86% (2024), with about 90% of supply growth concentrated in the top single supplier. | IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025 executive summary | Supports mandatory concentration-resilience checks before single-route factory commitment. | S3 |
| E6 | IEA reports demand for magnet rare earths grew by about 6-8% in 2024. | IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025 executive summary | Prevents teams from interpreting low quote volatility as low demand pressure in planning cycles. | S3 |
| E7 | European Commission CRMA page states 100% of rare earths used for permanent magnets in the EU are refined in China, while the CRMA 2030 benchmark limits single-third-country dependence to 65% at each relevant stage. | European Commission CRMA page accessed May 15, 2026 | Adds an explicit policy reference for regional concentration fallback planning in EU-bound programs. | S10 |
| E8 | IEA Global EV Outlook 2025 reports electric car sales exceeded 17 million globally in 2024, with over 11 million sold in China. | IEA Global EV Outlook 2025 executive summary | Strengthens demand-side context for RFQ volume planning and lead-time discipline in factory screening. | S9 |
| E9 | IATF oversight references include both under-contract and contract-terminated certification-body lists, while stakeholder communiqué 002 states Rules 6th Edition is fully effective by January 1, 2025 (Rules 5th Edition obsolete). | IATF Stakeholder Communiqué 002, January 2024 | Prevents stale audit criteria from being used in factory release decisions for automotive programs. | S6, S7, S11 |
| E10 | IFR World Robotics 2025 reports 542,000 global industrial-robot installations in 2024, with China at 295,000 installations (54% share). | IFR World Robotics 2025 | Adds measurable automation-capacity context to factory capability and continuity screening. | S8 |
| E11 | ECHA states that for Candidate List SVHC above 0.1% w/w in articles, Article 33 communication applies and consumer requests must be answered within 45 days free of charge; SCIP submissions apply from January 5, 2021. | ECHA pages accessed May 15, 2026 | Prevents Article 33 and SCIP from being collapsed into one checkbox and reduces late-stage EU shipment risk. | S4, S5 |
| E12 | Federal Register notice 2024-21217 lists HTS 8505.11.00 (permanent magnets of metal) under Annex C and applies a 25% additional ad valorem duty effective January 1, 2026. | Federal Register publication September 18, 2024; effective January 1, 2026 | Adds a mandatory U.S.-bound landed-cost branch for covered permanent-magnet imports before quote acceptance. | S12 |
| E13 | The same Federal Register notice states the additional duty is applied in addition to any ordinary customs duty, with HTS Chapter 99 linkage for implementation. | Federal Register notice 2024-21217 + USTR modification determination | Prevents base-duty-only cost models that can erase margin after customs reconciliation. | S12, S13 |
| E14 | Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 Article 5 sets the 2030 benchmark that at each relevant processing stage no more than 65% of the Union annual consumption of any strategic raw material should come from one third country. | CRMA entered into force May 23, 2024 | Clarifies that concentration controls need dated planning thresholds, not generic country-risk language. | S14 |
| E15 | CRMA Article 29 introduces product-level permanent-magnet information duties, including >0.2 kg permanent-magnet scope for many products and a baseline applicability date from May 24, 2027 (or later depending on delegated-act timing and product class). | Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 Article 29 timeline | Converts CRMA from a macro policy note into executable product-level compliance scheduling for EU-bound programs. | S14 |
| E16 | IEC 60404-5 and IEC 60404-8-1 define measurement methods and specification context for permanent magnet materials, so cross-supplier Br/Hcj/BHmax comparisons need aligned test basis. | IEC editions available before this update; pages accessed May 19, 2026 | Reduces false ranking of factories caused by non-aligned test methods or temperature basis in datasheets. | S15, S16 |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Time marker | Signal | Execution risk if ignored | Minimum action | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2025 | China added export controls on seven heavy rare-earth related categories. | Teams may lock single-route supply assumptions without a policy-shock fallback. | Require dual-source trigger and quote-expiry windows before commercial lock. | S2 |
| October-November 2025 | Control scope was expanded in October, then partially suspended for one year in November while April controls remained. | Teams can misread temporary policy adjustment as structural risk removal. | Tag controls as dynamic and keep quarterly policy re-check gate in RFQ workflow. | S2 |
| January 1, 2025 | IATF Rules 6th Edition became fully effective and Rules 5th Edition became obsolete. | Supplier-release checks can fail if audit templates still reference obsolete rule sets. | Lock release checklist version to Rules 6th Edition and retain evidence timestamp. | S11 |
| January 1, 2026 | U.S. Section 301 modifications apply a 25% additional duty to covered permanent magnets under HTS 8505.11.00. | U.S.-bound programs can underquote landed cost if additional duty scope is ignored. | Add HS-classification check and Chapter 99 linkage review before quote lock. | S12, S13 |
| 2024 baseline, 2030 target | EU states 100% of rare earths for permanent magnets are refined in China and sets a 65% single-country dependency cap target by 2030. | EU-bound programs may ignore concentration exposure until late compliance or contract stage. | Add regional concentration stress test and second-source path before PO release. | S10 |
| 2024 market outcome | Global EV sales exceeded 17 million, with over 11 million in China. | Demand growth can be underestimated when planning lead time and buffer strategy. | Use demand-upside scenario in supplier-capacity negotiation and delivery terms. | S9 |
| May 24, 2027 baseline | CRMA Article 29 permanent-magnet product-information obligations begin for covered products (with delegated-act and product-class timing conditions). | Teams may track only concentration benchmarks and miss product-level evidence obligations for launch readiness. | Create a product-level CRMA readiness checklist with threshold check, owner, and dated evidence gate. | S14 |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Factory sourcing model | Traceability depth | Quote execution speed | Compliance control | Concentration resilience | Best-fit scenario | Counterexample / limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single factory direct | Usually highest for lot path, drawing revision, and process handoff | Moderate; often slower in discovery, faster after design lock | Strong when compliance owner and evidence packet are assigned early | Can be weak if volume is tied to one site or one country path | Stable recurring geometry with high documentation discipline and forecast visibility. | Fast initial quote can still fail if downstream capacity is saturated during policy shocks. |
| Trader-managed factories | Variable; depends on how consistently upstream factory evidence is normalized | Fast for discovery, but can slow down during technical clarification loops | Needs strict evidence templates to avoid fragmented declarations | Can improve supplier breadth but may hide shared upstream bottlenecks | Early market scan when multiple factories must be filtered quickly. | Low headline price can collapse when drawing assumptions differ across upstream factories. |
| Dual-factory network | Medium-to-high only when shared templates and owner roles are explicit | Balanced: slower than trader-only, often more stable at conversion stage | Best when Article 33/SCIP and audit evidence are version-controlled centrally | Strongest path for continuity planning across mining/refining/magnet shocks | Programs that need resilience and competitive pricing without single-route dependence. | Without governance ownership, complexity can erase speed and increase RFQ churn. |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Risk | Trigger | Impact | Mitigation | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quote issued without magnetic-curve and boundary evidence | Factory responds with price-only offer and no thermal/demag test mapping | Design-to-quote mismatch and avoidable RFQ churn | Require one-page boundary pack: grade curve basis, coating claim basis, and geometry assumptions. | E1, E2 |
| Lead-time promise exceeds factory delivery reality under concentration shocks | Compressed lead-time accepted for complex geometry with no diversification trigger | Pilot delay, repeated drawing clarifications, and schedule slip | Split quote into sample gate + production gate, plus dual-source trigger and quote-expiry policy. | E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7 |
| Compliance duty mismatch for EU-bound shipment | Article 33 / SCIP obligations treated as optional or merged into one unchecked claim | Border/commercial risk and late-stage legal rework | Add explicit compliance owner, due-date, and evidence-ID fields in RFQ checklist. | E11 |
| U.S.-bound landed cost underquoted due to missed additional-duty scope | Quote model uses base customs duty only and skips Section 301 additional-duty mapping for covered permanent magnets. | Margin erosion, re-quote churn, and avoidable commercial escalation after customs-cost reconciliation. | Run pre-quote HS/classification review and include Chapter 99 additional-duty lines in landed-cost model. | E12, E13 |
| CRMA product-level permanent-magnet obligations are missed | Program tracks macro concentration targets but does not schedule Article 29 product-information duties. | Late compliance workstream creation, launch friction, and avoidable legal/commercial rework. | Add CRMA Article 29 threshold and timeline checks to RFQ governance with explicit owner and evidence cadence. | E14, E15 |
| Automotive qualification accepted with obsolete rule basis | Certificate screenshot accepted without under-contract status verification or current rule-edition check | Supplier-release quality risk, audit exposure, and release-template mismatch | Verify under-contract CB status, review terminated-list edge cases, and lock checklist to Rules 6th Edition. | E9 |
| Macro indicators mistaken for deterministic quote forecast | Teams assume global concentration metrics can predict exact week-level supplier capacity | Overconfident schedules and avoidable commercial escalation | Use macro data as risk multipliers, then validate with matched multi-supplier RFQ cycles. | E5, E6, E7, E8, E10 |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Boundary scope | Applies when | Does not apply when | Minimum executable action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Checker verdict scope | You need stage-1 RFQ screening for boundary fit and next action routing. | You need final electromagnetic, thermal-life, and mechanical-release signoff. | Treat output as pre-RFQ filter; run formal validation before PO lock. |
| EU-bound compliance boundary | Article contains Candidate List SVHC above 0.1% w/w and enters EU market. | Teams assume Article 33 communication alone closes SCIP duties. | Track Article 33 and SCIP as separate gates with owner, due date, and evidence ID. |
| U.S. tariff-scope boundary | Program imports covered permanent magnets into the U.S. under relevant HTS and Chapter 99 mappings. | Delivery is outside U.S. customs scope or product classification is outside covered additional-duty lines. | Validate HS classification and additional-duty applicability before finalizing quote and margin. |
| Automotive governance boundary | Supplier uses IATF 16949 claims in qualification package. | Teams accept logo screenshots without contract-status validation or rule-edition checks. | Check under-contract status, confirm Rules 6th Edition basis, and record verification timestamp before release. |
| Concentration-risk interpretation | You need to stress-test sourcing continuity under policy and capacity shocks. | Teams treat macro concentration statistics as guaranteed quote timelines. | Convert concentration signals into dual-source triggers and quote-expiry rules. |
| EU concentration-policy boundary | Program decisions involve EU-bound long-horizon sourcing and policy-exposure planning. | Teams treat current route concentration as acceptable without a 2030 dependency mitigation path. | Use CRMA 65% dependency direction as a planning constraint and maintain at least one viable alternate supply route. |
| CRMA Article 29 product-information boundary | Covered EU-bound products contain permanent magnets within Article 29 scope conditions (including threshold and product-category timing logic). | Teams treat CRMA as concentration narrative only and skip product-level disclosure planning. | Track delegated-act timing, weight threshold, and product-category applicability in a dated compliance checklist. |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Scenario | Why it failed | Minimum recovery path | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quote looked low risk on engineering inputs but EU shipment failed late | Article 33 and SCIP were merged into one checklist item and not tracked separately. | Re-open RFQ gate with separate compliance owners and evidence identifiers. | E11 |
| Supplier showed automotive certificate but release template used obsolete criteria | Status and rule-edition basis were not cross-checked against current IATF governance references. | Add mandatory under-contract + terminated-list verification and explicit Rules 6th Edition confirmation with timestamped evidence. | E9 |
| Lead-time promise looked acceptable but capacity shifted after policy tightening | Single-route sourcing plan ignored mining/refining/magnet concentration exposure. | Trigger dual-source RFQ and apply quote-expiry window before commercial lock. | E4, E5, E7 |
| Engineering fit looked acceptable but U.S. commercial margin collapsed post-quote | Quote used base-duty assumptions and skipped Section 301 additional-duty scope for covered permanent magnets. | Re-run landed-cost model with HS/Chapter 99 validation and reopen quote controls before PO. | E12, E13 |
| EU program tracked concentration signals but still hit late compliance friction | Article 29 product-level permanent-magnet information duties were not scheduled as a separate workstream. | Add Article 29 threshold/timeline gate with named owner, then backfill evidence before release milestones. | E14, E15 |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| Open question | Status | Current evidence state | Minimum executable next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public benchmark for factory quote-cycle distribution by arc geometry complexity | Pending confirmation | No auditable open dataset was found for percentile quote cycles under matched OD/ID/angle/tolerance/coating packs. | Run a matched multi-factory RFQ batch using one fixed drawing pack and record cycle-time variance. |
| Open rejection-root-cause dataset for export shipments of custom arc magnets | Pending confirmation | Public evidence is fragmented and vendor-controlled; no neutral baseline found in this round. | Track internal NCR/claim tags by factory type for two quarters and convert into release gates. |
| Public normalized dataset for coating durability by identical arc-magnet geometry across suppliers | No reliable public dataset | No neutral open dataset was found for like-for-like corrosion and adhesion durability under identical test methods. | Require unified test method and lot-level report format in RFQ and compare results on matched specimens. |
| Open benchmark for customs-classification dispute rates on magnet assemblies by destination market | No reliable public dataset | No neutral public dataset was found that reports dispute frequency by magnet geometry, assembly context, and customs jurisdiction. | Maintain internal post-entry adjustment log and use it to tighten pre-quote HS/classification review rules. |
Mobile tip: swipe horizontally if columns are truncated.
| ID | Source | How used in this page | Date context | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Brave query sample ("arc magnet factories") | Intent audit evidence: sampled top results are dominated by supplier/factory transactional pages with RFQ/customization flows. | Accessed May 15, 2026 | Open source |
| S2 | USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 - Rare Earths | Provides 2025 production/import-reliance/import-source metrics and 2025 export-control event timeline used for sourcing-risk gates. | Published February 2026 | Open source |
| S3 | IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025 (Executive Summary) | Provides 2024 concentration and demand signals (top-three refining share, supply-growth concentration, and magnet rare-earth demand growth). | Published May 2025 | Open source |
| S4 | ECHA REACH Article 33 communication page | Used to define communication duty and response-time boundary for EU-bound article workflows. | Accessed May 15, 2026 | Open source |
| S5 | ECHA SCIP overview | Used to separate SCIP submission obligations (from January 5, 2021) from Article 33 communication checks. | Accessed May 15, 2026 | Open source |
| S6 | IATF Global Oversight: under contract CB list | Defines the auditable list of certification bodies currently authorized for IATF 16949 certification activity. | Accessed May 15, 2026 | Open source |
| S7 | IATF Global Oversight: contract terminated list | Used as a counterexample control so legacy certificates are not accepted without status checks. | Accessed May 15, 2026 | Open source |
| S8 | IFR World Robotics 2025 report | Provides automation-capacity context, including global installations and China share in 2024. | Published 2025, accessed May 15, 2026 | Open source |
| S9 | IEA Global EV Outlook 2025 (Executive Summary) | Provides 2024 EV-sales scale used for demand-side context in factory-capacity planning. | Published May 2025 | Open source |
| S10 | European Commission: European Critical Raw Materials Act page | Provides EU dependency baseline and 2030 benchmark targets used for concentration-boundary planning. | Accessed May 15, 2026 | Open source |
| S11 | IATF Stakeholder Communiqué 002 (Release of Rules 6th Edition, January 2024) | Provides the effective-date and obsolescence boundary for automotive audit-rule usage in supplier release. | Published January 2024 | Open source |
| S12 | Federal Register notice 2024-21217 (Section 301 modification; Annex C tariff lines and effective dates) | Provides official U.S. additional-duty line, rate, and effective-date basis for covered permanent magnets and landed-cost risk controls. | Published September 18, 2024 | Open source |
| S13 | USTR Section 301 Modifications Determination PDF (September 12, 2024) | Used to cross-check implementation context and Chapter 99/additional-duty structure for U.S. import-cost modeling. | Published September 12, 2024; accessed May 19, 2026 | Open source |
| S14 | EUR-Lex: Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 (Critical Raw Materials Act) | Used for Article 5 strategic benchmark interpretation and Article 29 permanent-magnet product-information applicability/timing boundaries. | Entered into force May 23, 2024; accessed May 19, 2026 | Open source |
| S15 | IEC 60404-8-1:2023 (Magnetic materials, individual materials) | Used to set method/specification boundary for comparing permanent-magnet properties across suppliers. | Published 2023; accessed May 19, 2026 | Open source |
| S16 | IEC 60404-5 (Methods of measurement of magnetic properties) | Used to reinforce that datasheet values require aligned measurement methods before cross-supplier ranking decisions. | Current edition listing accessed May 19, 2026 | Open source |
Main CTA: send your arc magnet factories RFQ package